News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Pooper

04/06/10 10:36 PM

#1606 RE: Hoey #1605

pass
icon url

Hoey

04/06/10 10:39 PM

#1607 RE: Hoey #1605

Heres the process as I understand it.
You send as an attachement to mparker7.petroamericacop@gmail.com
That is the IT department. They are coordinating information with the TA as these come in.. So it makes it sooooo much easier if they are all in the same format.. not redoing things. Alright Night Petro Peeps
icon url

Pooper

04/06/10 10:41 PM

#1608 RE: Hoey #1605

Hooey

If I use Wordpad to forsward the attachment I have to send it from G-mail to my ATT address - to Outlook express.

Then, if I send it as an attachment forwarded from Wordpad, it will be going to them from my ATT Address.

It was specified that we send it the same way we joined, which was my Google Address -

So, whom are we getting the e-mail you referred to from? Petro or the T/A???

P
icon url

BeWell

04/06/10 10:54 PM

#1610 RE: Hoey #1605

Hoey,
I typed the format of the form into the body of an email and filled in the information under the headings and returned the requested information (Name/Company/Email) to the mparker7 email but did not send it as an attachment but rather as a form format in the body of the email due to the fact that I only have the FREE Microsoft Word software in Read Only access which means that you cannot edit or copy or type in any new information in the blanks on that form. That may be the case for others as well. What is the difference if they get the info in an attachment or in the body of the email?

If the attachment form has to be used, I would need to find another computer where Microsoft Word has been licensed for full program / software usage and do the data submission over again. Wouldn't it be confusing for the Petro Office to receive a 2nd email from individuals who had already submitted one email with that info?

However, if all of the Petro participants had submitted a confirmation email with the name with which the shares were purchased in the beginning, why do they need to do this verification of what had been already emailed a year and a half ago?

Over 6,000 Petro shareholders, it seems to be a lot of work that would have to be done. Hopefully whatever remains to be done will get done as quickly and simply as possible. Perhaps this verification issue will be addressed on the Thursday calls also.

What will be will be. Go Petro.