News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Burk

12/11/04 5:00 AM

#333107 RE: lee kramer #333106

How many years is that, Lee?


hahahaaaahhaaahah. Ok, i've had some wine and now I'm going to beddddddddddddddd.

Nuff said. Have a great night...er, morning......

See ya this weekend!!
icon url

James T Kirk

12/11/04 9:57 AM

#333120 RE: lee kramer #333106

Maybe the problem isn't the reliability of the head and shoulders formation but rather the reliability of the person claiming they see a head and shoulders formation (not referring to anyone in particular). From reading message boards, people seem to see head and shoulders patterns everywhere. No wonder they fail so much.
icon url

lee kramer

12/11/04 11:24 AM

#333126 RE: lee kramer #333106

Hi bullsjihm: Interactivebrokers.com and MBtrading.com have very low commissions; so low that I don't consider commisssiom costs when I trade. You might take a look.
icon url

porter

12/11/04 6:03 PM

#333181 RE: lee kramer #333106

<I've noted over the years that the H&S distribution top is one of the least reliable indicator.>
------------------------------------------------------------

Lee--

FWIW, if you follow e-waves, H&Ss more often than not are corrective fourth waves that present themselves as A-B-C formations.

People are calling for a top here so we have more to run.

--Porter