News Focus
News Focus
icon url

YourPlanet

03/12/10 10:14 PM

#18504 RE: Chiron #18503

Rule 9019
Note it was just a proposal
icon url

Vulcanized Crawler

03/12/10 10:18 PM

#18505 RE: Chiron #18503

gee if jpm bot off everyone, including our lawyer of the ec, we should just jump off a bridge or buy more jpm? ROFLOL
icon url

BullNBear52

03/12/10 10:44 PM

#18513 RE: Chiron #18503

The judge allowed the EC in only as a 3rd party to the suit. Common shareholders in reality are the low man on the totem pole in a BK proceeding.

I went round and round with some Wamu shareholders on the JPM board here. I pointed out that at the end of the day they would not see a dime out of the suit.

I also pointed out that I don't own either stock. So the basher stuff is rather funny.
icon url

JV44

03/13/10 1:58 AM

#18538 RE: Chiron #18503

YOURE RIGHT WITH THAT CURVE BALL....FOOLED EVERYONE IN THE STRIKE ZONE!!!
icon url

mordicai

03/13/10 5:02 PM

#18689 RE: Chiron #18503

The turnover proceeding has not been settled nor has it been dismissed. The proceeding cannot be voluntarily dismissed by the holding company without a hearing unless all parties agree. The bondholders were allowed to intervene and their lawyer has now said that the proposal is unacceptable. So I would expect that the bondholders will put the matter on the docket again for judgment to be rendered since a global settlement was not reached. And once the ec is made a party by intervention motion being granted, the ec will do the same. Thus, the pressure can and will be put on JPM and the fdic once again to reach a better settlement.