News Focus
News Focus
icon url

sidedraft

03/10/10 12:02 AM

#165922 RE: Disaster Master #165911

Where are you getting your information, it seems bogus.

A 72 hour "holding period", through brokerage firms?
icon url

ChangeDirector

03/10/10 12:31 AM

#165930 RE: Disaster Master #165911

That is incorrect. Dividend dates have nothing to do with trade settlements, they have to do with dates set by the company well before the dividend date called ex-dividend dates.

And in fact, if you buy on the day before the ex-dividend date, you will get the dividend. That is a known fact. It has nothing whatsoever to do with trade settlement dates.

Much as a court settlement has absolutely nothing to do with trade settlement dates. If you own the stock, you own it, period.

Let's put this discussion to an end. If anyone, anyone, anywhere, can post any kind of verifiable record indicating that in the case of a bankrupt company that ended up coming out of bankruptcy, or that ended up paying out to commons, that there was ONE SINGLE INSTANCE of commons not getting paid because they bought less than 3 days before the settlement and did not get paid, POST IT.

It is nothing but a scare tactic. Don't buy into it.
icon url

fsshon

03/10/10 1:31 AM

#165958 RE: Disaster Master #165911

Well there you go, GO READ THE IBOX! How many times does this board have to say: Every question you are asking is easily answered in the Ibox.. You're wasting valuable time with this frame of mind COLLEGE STUDENT!!!

Don't forget to feed the horse and lead him to water..

I am all for the settlement and I am hoping to make a decent amount of money for a college student, but I am not putting my buggy before the horse.



I don't think it matters whether or not you are for settlement, what matters is whether or not JPM is for a settlement!