News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Chump77

02/28/10 10:24 AM

#21809 RE: ema-266 #21807

I think your heart is getting in the way of your head on this. No matter how much material you put out or how many times you post something, it doesn't take away the fact that this (like you said) is something that has never been done and the chances of it being done here are VERY SLIM.

I'm pretty sure, if you revalue 1 for 1 then this currency will fail. If you slowly revalue; say .05 to 1 and then slowly build up the currency then it will work, BUT 1 for 1 is just too far fetched. It's not hard for me to grasp this concept.....I understand it completely but as many have said, simple numbers say this will not happen the way you and others WANT it to happen.

However, when playing the lottery, I visualize the win....so here's to me visualizing.
icon url

TechStockBob

02/28/10 10:54 AM

#21816 RE: ema-266 #21807

I see it differently as many but that would be real sweet!
icon url

tryoty

02/28/10 10:59 AM

#21817 RE: ema-266 #21807

"When they say "remove the 3 zeros" They are talking about the removal of the larger denominations"

That is your spin on it, your OPINION, that you continually state as fact. If they were talking about removing the larger denominations they would say that. They aren't saying that. They are saying, repeatedly, and clearly, that they are removing 3 zeros. That's a LOP.

I simply do not understand your stubborn denial with this. They are telling you as clearly as can be told, that they are LOP'ing the IQD.

CBI: "We will execute a LOP in the near future."
ema-266: "See everyone? No LOP!"

Unbelievable.