News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Paulness

02/26/10 5:56 PM

#60630 RE: Roscoe85 #60629

OK, how about a merger into a company that is not trading, but has a good amount of cash and a nice portfolio of patents , complimentary to CYGX ,and are looking to get to be a tradable company . I know it sounds to good , but it is still a good bet that CYGX fat lady may not sing.
icon url

Paulness

02/26/10 5:56 PM

#60631 RE: Roscoe85 #60629

OK, how about a merger into a company that is not trading, but has a good amount of cash and a nice portfolio of patents , complimentary to CYGX ,and are looking to be a tradable company . I know it sounds to good , but it is still a good bet that CYGX fat lady may not sing.
icon url

gdepc

02/26/10 11:09 PM

#60635 RE: Roscoe85 #60629

Roscoe85

The expense of the attorneys and the auditors ect would be pick up by the buyers in cygx situation.
That's only if cygx was attractive to an other company.
A buyout would be the only option who would merge with cygx at this point.

Only a company worse off.

The real question is does the ip have value nothing more.

gdepc