Chief, you are missing the point.
Sure enough if I analyze each word you type independently I can make sense of your writing. (although oftentimes the semantics are missing <g>)
The problem is that yours is only one amongst the hundreds of posts that I read. I have no time to focus in each isolated word, but I take the whole phrase on the fly, and "recognize" it by the shape of the words.
You butcher the shape of the words.
In order to read your staff I have to slow down to 1/4 of my usual reading speed.
For this reason many times I just skip your posts. (when I recognize them early enough)
I choose to believe that you post in order to be read, and not only as just another excretory function. In that case it behooves you to be as clear as possible. (Unless you aim to muddle the waters on purpose...) <g>
Respectfully, (and only a little tongue in cheek)
Huluriasquias.