News Focus
News Focus
icon url

olddog967

02/18/10 8:32 PM

#517 RE: revlis #509

revlis; Don't know where that person got that information, but it is not true. A patent infringement case can be initiated in federal court or the ITC on the basis of a single sample imported into the US.


Here is a Federal Circuit decision which allowed an infringement case to go forward where only a piece of medical equipment was imported into the US for use in a trade show. The item did not yet have FDA approval for sale in the US.

http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:do4BIBpF7YgJ:www.cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions/08-1279.pdf+patent+infringement+on+the+basis+of+a+sample+imported+into+US&hl=en&gl=us&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEEShj6FaZa502g0tgt9q7LdxVZ5RtXeZmtb_ksMALDxSE75HmW0ooTpuQV-wDyOd-TEqVzOqFZ_CpJduiAwU7IQDKfgdsVjiV_B1kRqAk1PrkFeWVguCi0DVsQqGU0-jL8iWp4DpT&sig=AHIEtbRDOrl7rjL0yCWxldFfErMj27GxZQ


In regard to the ITC, note the highlighted section from the article.

"Establishing a case
To establish standing at the ITC, the complaining party
must prove that it owns the asserted patent, that the
accused product was imported into the US, and that an
industry in the US relating to the articles protected by the
asserted IP right exists or is in the process of being established
– in other words, that there is a relevant domestic
industry. Patent ownership is typically established by the
submission of a certified copy of the patent and patent
assignment. Importation is typically established by the submission
of shipping labels taken from a sample accused
product purchased in the US. Decisions by the ITC and
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) indicate
that a single importation of an accused article may be sufficient
to satisfy the ITC’s importation requirement,
and
that the electronic importation of an accused product, such
as an infringing computer software program, in digital
form may also be sufficient."

http://www.kirkland.com/siteFiles/kirkexp/publications/2386/Document1/Levine_MIP.pdf