Replies to post #292398 on Spongetech Delivery Systems Inc (fka SPNGQ)

[Mingy]

I 100% percent disagree with your statement about my research. By exposing the shorts, and their tools they use to manipulate the system in their quest to destroy Spongetech, I bring attention to what they are doing. I hope to bring enough eyes to the situation, where they’re ability to operate behind a cloak is impaired. I also wish to invite more investigation, and hopefully then, when enough is exposed, proper charges can be filed against these criminals.

Back room dealings between the naked shorts, and their friends in the regulatory system, are put at serious risk when people are aware, and watching.

I’m tired of the attitude there is nothing we can do to improve the situation here. You think we’d be in this situation if it wasn’t for the backroom dealings? Absolutely not. So are we really supposed to sit back and let it continue to happen?

I’m not. Get involved.

[spongeboy]

"Knight is selling naked everyday"... At first I thought....... what a bold statement.... but then I thought .....this must be 100% correct..... I bet if you wanted to buy 50,000 at .06 - Knight would fill it at .03 to keep the chart in line ......The 50,000 share buyer would not complain "wow, I was willing to pay .06 and it filled for .03!" But when the sh&T hits the fan and everyone wants to get paper stock certificates "certs" do they exist? .. or were orders filled at any and all costs to keep the price down?? Selling naked is the only way to explain our recent "trading channel" and only a market maker can do it. "Who" and "How many shares" are the only unanswered questions. I know the "why" is $$$$