News Focus
News Focus
icon url

TQS

02/05/10 12:48 PM

#147667 RE: TQS #147664

You just answered my question...thanks.....
icon url

Chiron

02/05/10 12:49 PM

#147670 RE: TQS #147664

JPM is on board for a settlement, they have backed down big time over the past few months. It has been the FDIC dogs barking, and hopefully this will push the closer to ponying up their part of the settlement.
icon url

rramirez82

02/05/10 12:51 PM

#147679 RE: TQS #147664

I've said that I think the FDIC is really holding up the settlement at this point. The FDIC is trying to push a bunch of things out into March - including the oral argument on its motion to modify the stay. If SJ is ruled on now, it would indicate that the FDIC wrongfully conveyed assets that belonged to WMI - and such an indication would result in liability to the FDIC.
icon url

mordicai

02/05/10 12:53 PM

#147681 RE: TQS #147664

Because as I said last year, at some point JPM and the FDIC become enemies. JPM's attitude is this is FDIC's problem...don't fault JPM because FDIC sold WMB to us cheap. Only reason JPM is going to pay, is because it took the holding company's property and violated confidentiality agreements, trademarks, patents, and probably the law.