For me it is the opposite view. They have not shown any progress for the companies they own. In fact we don't even know what they really own and if they are making any money. At this point lack of transparency for what they are and own etc implies failure to produce. Tired of the excuses they need to hide this info from their stockholders for some lame reason. We own this and there should be more info available. No one here can show links to prove much of anything of substance. Leaves us all speculating. I can live with that scenario for a while but this has been the case for a very long time. I believe if they were succeeding and their holdings were doing well we would hear about it. Thus I conclude until proven differently they are not a strong healthy business. I went from positive and forgiving to a negative view based on their lack of transparency and progress.
Seems to me if they owned several to a bunch of successful businesses you could point to links that would make that obvious. Maybe that is foolish of me. You are welcome to assume the opposite. Damn shame we don't have the facts so we would not have to assume. GLTY
hoap there lies the key TRANSPARENCY. we can all guess because thats all it is, the good part is they are still trading the bad part is it is stuck with no bid and hardly any volume. it is encouraging they are still active for how long who knows?? i guess it all depends if you trust gene newton and rcch!!
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
