Replies to post #5438 on Freedom to DISAGREE (FREEDOM)

[sarals]

LOL

[BullNBear52]

Who's the idiot who writes the editorial page?

Taricani and Bevilacqua

01:00 AM EST on Friday, December 3, 2004



It appears that Chief U.S. District Judge Ernest Torres, through a special prosecutor who cost taxpayers more than $100,000, has found out who supplied the videotape to TV reporter Jim Taricani that caught government corruption in action. Mr. Taricani, meanwhile, faces the prospect of jail for protecting a source: lawyer Joseph Bevilacqua Jr., who now asserts (improbably, it seems to us) that he wanted the reporter to identify him more than 2 1/2 years ago. Mr. Bevilacqua faces his own legal problems, which may far exceed Mr. Taricani's.

The court has made it clear that its wishes will be obeyed -- or else. At the time that the tape was aired -- showing former Mayor Vincent Cianci's right-hand man, Frank Corrente, taking a $1,000 bribe -- the tape was under a protective order from U.S. District Judge Ronald Lagueux, who feared that a jury might be prejudiced if the public were allowed to see so vividly what was going on in Providence government.

And so Judge Torres, with Ahab-like tenacity, has hunted down his white whale: the person who passed along the tape.

There are no heroes here, in our view. Judges' orders are supposed to be obeyed. But the price of this crusade seems out of scale with its public benefit.

Mr. Taricani, although having displayed a lack of wisdom in some aspects of this case, is hardly a dangerous criminal who deserves time in jail.

And the taxpayer money and other resources spent on this case could more profitably have been spent on other government activities -- such as prosecuting criminals who pose a threat to the public, rather than tormenting a reporter with heart problems who asserts that he was trying to keep a promise to protect the identity of a source.

This case also points to judicial overzealousness in sealing off important public information. Judge Lagueux had prohibited all members of the prosecution and defense from disclosing any of the FBI audio or video recordings. But as even Judge Torres ruled, airing the tape did not have the feared effect of denying the defendants a fair trial. And how about the right of the public to see what is going on in its own government -- especially since the Cianci regime was still in power when the videotape was aired?

The case raises questions about Judge Torres's temperament. Justice should be tempered with a sense of proportion, moderation and, in some cases, mercy. Surely, the overall benefit to the public should be weighed.

The judge's actions in this episode have drawn some national condemnation and, yes, some praise, too (which will probably increase after this week's revelations about Messrs. Taricani and Bevilacqua). In any event, we fear that Mr. Torres's actions may slow the flow of important public information, making it still harder for citizens to discover -- and thus stop -- government corruption.

For now, we can only hope that Judge Torres shows some mercy in sentencing Mr. Taricani.


http://www.projo.com/opinion/editorials/content/projo_20041203_03torres.19c08b.html

[BullNBear52]

JFK edits Sorensen...

January 15, 2005
OP-ED CONTRIBUTOR
Ask How
By THURSTON CLARKE

Willsboro, N.Y.

AMERICANS watching John F. Kennedy's 1961 inauguration on television saw a scene worthy of Currier & Ives. The marble facade of the Capitol gleamed in the sun, dignitaries wore top hats and dark overcoats and the cold air turned Kennedy's breath into white clouds. When he said, "Let the word go forth from this time and place, to friend and foe alike, that the torch has been passed to a new generation," his words actually appeared to be going forth into the exhilarating air.

No one knew that Kennedy was wearing long underwear so he could remove his topcoat and appear youthful and energetic, or that he had received months of tutoring from a speech coach, or that there was so much animosity among the platform's dignitaries that if grudges had weight, the entire contraption would have collapsed. No one suspected that Cardinal Richard Cushing had slowed his invocation because he believed that smoke wafting from beneath the podium came from a smoldering bomb meant for Kennedy, and he wanted to absorb the blast himself. (It was actually a short circuit.) No one knew that as Cushing droned on, Kennedy was probably improving his address in his mind. (He would make 32 alterations to the reading copy of his inaugural address as he spoke.)

Praise for his inaugural address came from across the political spectrum - Barry Goldwater said, "God, I'd like to be able to do what that boy did there" - and was so extravagant it seems hard to believe the nation was even more divided than it is today. Kennedy had won the 1960 election with only 49.7 percent of the popular vote, yet a Gallup poll taken soon after his inauguration showed him with an approval rating of 72 percent. His own pollster, Lou Harris, put it at an astounding 92 percent. Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton, perhaps hoping for similar ratings, have paraphrased lines from Kennedy's speech in their own inaugural addresses.

The most recent offender was George W. Bush, who in 2001 translated "Ask not what your country can do for you - ask what you can do for your country" into "What you do is as important as anything government does. I ask you to seek a common good beyond your comfort; to defend needed reforms against easy attacks; to serve your nation, beginning with your neighbor."

Kennedy's imitators have failed to appreciate that the words in his address were only part of its magic. There was also the brilliant weather, Jackie Kennedy's wardrobe, Robert Frost's poem and a president-elect who had devoted almost as much attention to his appearance as his words - darkening his tan in Palm Beach, and fussing over the cut of his suit and the arrangement of dignitaries on the platform.

They have failed to appreciate something else, something that is nearly impossible to replicate. It was Kennedy's life - and his close calls with death - that gave the speech its power and urgency. Those who study the speech would do well to pay less attention to the words and more attention to how he wrote the speech and to the relationship between its words and Kennedy's character and experience.

Kennedy composed the most memorable and poetic lines of his inaugural during a flight from Washington to Palm Beach 10 days before his inauguration. He summoned his secretary Evelyn Lincoln into his private compartment on his plane, the Caroline, and told her that he wanted to dictate some "ideas" for his inaugural.

He had in hand a draft written by his principal speechwriter, Ted Sorensen. Throughout his campaign, Kennedy had often carried a Sorensen speech to the stage only to abandon much of it in favor of his own off-the-cuff remarks. He did this again during the Palm Beach flight, and dictated several pages of his own material. It is in Evelyn Lincoln's shorthand loops and squiggles, then, that one first reads versions of "Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill, that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship," and "Let the word go forth from this time and place, to friend and foe alike, that the torch has been passed to a new generation of Americans - born in this century, tempered by war, disciplined by a hard and bitter peace, proud of our ancient heritage."

Kennedy revised his inaugural in Palm Beach, without the assistance of the focus groups or speechwriting teams that have become de rigueur. He read it aloud to his wife, rewrote some passages on sheets of yellow legal paper and consulted with Ted Sorensen. He did not need much help revising his dictation because it was essentially autobiographical. It told his story, and that of his generation: "born in this century," "tempered by war," "disciplined by a hard and bitter peace."

Behind this structure lay five pivotal moments in his life: his travels through Europe on the eve of World War II, his experiences in the Pacific in 1943, his visit to a devastated postwar Berlin in 1945, his tour through Asia as a young congressman in 1951, and his encounter with the abject poor during the 1960 West Virginia primary. All but one of these had occurred overseas, a reminder that he was not only the most widely traveled man ever to become president, but someone who had experienced many of the defining moments of his life outside his own country.

Kennedy had a strong emotional connection with the passages inspired by his own experiences. Throughout his political career he had sometimes choked up at Memorial Day and Veterans Day ceremonies when speaking about those who had lost their lives in World War II. Among the passages he had dictated on the flight was this one: "Since this country was founded, each generation of Americans has been summoned to give testimony to its national loyalty. The graves of young Americans who answered the call to service surround the globe."

Numbered among these young Americans, of course, were his brother Joseph Kennedy Jr., his brother-in-law Billy Hartington, and his PT-109 crewmen Andrew Kirksey and Harold Marney. These two sentences, a tribute to their sacrifices, would prove to be the emotional turning point of his inaugural, the moment when his voice assumed a passion he seldom revealed, inspiring the audience at the Capitol, touching even the hearts of his opponents, and, according to accounts from the time, sending half-frozen tears rolling down cheeks.

It is possible that a future president will evoke a similar reaction with an inaugural address, uniting Americans in a common purpose, and opening a new era of idealism, optimism and national happiness. But to accomplish this, he must do more than others have done: simply paraphrase or echo Kennedy. Instead, he will have to deliver an inaugural that so clearly engages his emotions, and so convincingly represents a distillation of the spiritual and philosophical principles guiding his life, that it will, in the end, awaken a deep emotional response from the American people, too.


Thurston Clarke is the author, most recently, of "Ask Not: The Inauguration of John F. Kennedy and the Speech That Changed America."


http://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/15/opinion/15clarke.html?pagewanted=print&position=