News Focus
News Focus
icon url

michael laurino

01/27/10 4:25 AM

#141741 RE: frontiers #141740

Great post and even better DD!!!!
icon url

rramirez82

01/27/10 9:16 AM

#141752 RE: frontiers #141740

I just read this on Yahoo! and I thought this was an excellent summation of the $39B claim referenced by WMI-Weil. Great job Viv! My only two issues are, (1.) the remaining $11B; and (2.) under agency law principles, piercing the corporate veil, which might be an avenue under which a parent may be liable for actions of its subsidiaries.

Thoughts?
icon url

onco

01/27/10 9:25 AM

#141754 RE: frontiers #141740

thank you kindly for all the insight
icon url

daulton

01/27/10 9:57 AM

#141761 RE: frontiers #141740

That is a great summary ... The insolvent argument will obviously be dismissed by THJMW.
icon url

hipyvino

01/27/10 11:19 AM

#141775 RE: frontiers #141740

Thanks for the clarification... that puts this whole thing into perspectus... good post...
icon url

INSANEWAMUBUYER

01/27/10 12:33 PM

#141794 RE: frontiers #141740

Frontiers, great post and info. Thanks a lot :)