Replies to post #17634 on Laser Energetics, Inc. (LNGT)

[doc726]

Is this article from 1998?

[passthegravy]

Isn't this the company that asked LEI to manufacture a dazzler for them and LEI refused b/c it didn't like the technology? BTW, been discussed on this board since 2007, see: http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=24639838&txt2find=LE|Systems

[superstartup]

You know Laser Energetics Inc equipment is called Dazer Laser (not the other way round). There is no problem with the name / TM Dazer Laser. The US Patent and Trademark Office had already granted Laser Energetics Inc Notice of Allowance to use the Dazer Laser TM. This is after the opposition period. Only TASER opposed the use, but the opposition had been thrown out by the Trademark Appeal Board. Now is pending official registration.

Current Status: Opposition period completed, a Notice of Allowance has been issued.

http://tarr.uspto.gov/servlet/tarr?regser=serial&entry=77430170

Try harder.

[sermperfi2sam]

Testing of LE Systems DAZZLER in 2001 for the justice system was a failure. Sorry Moon.


http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/189571.pdf

you can read it all or go to pg. 13 final conclusions.


" The most essential improvement would be to minaturize the device with a laser diode design rather than it,s current solid state design."

"When higher power green laser diodes become available this tech. should be further explored."

This was in 2001, LNGT has the higher powered pumped tunable lasers,minaturized design and the patents etc. but you already knew this before you posted that article from 1998.