News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Slojab

01/25/10 10:55 AM

#2367 RE: chuck44l #2366

Ordinarily, I'd delete that post because it is clearly OT.

But if that is the best you can do, with regards to constant requests from posters of this board, to present your dd, I'll leave it be. But, we meant dd on VTPK.

I wouldn't want you to complain about my deleting your posts like you did earlier.

Now....got any dd on VTPK?

icon url

Newsworthy

01/25/10 11:01 AM

#2368 RE: chuck44l #2366

Yes all very well of its kind. This does nothing to advance your cause regarding Vertigo however. You need (I suggest) to address point by point the Vertigo report statement of facts. If you think the information is in some regard not correct then you must say why not. Demonstrate your reasons, vague comments and hysterical outbursts don't convince anyone. The people who have done the most damage possible to Vertigo are the very people who are involved in it on the face of it. For example, why has there been nothing out of Vertigo for such a long time? No financials, no press, nothing? That does nothing for promoting confidence in the stock does it? Address the outstanding issues that are pertinent to the main questions regarding this stock and they all revolve around the probity of the people involved don't they?