News Focus
News Focus
icon url

flyboy9

01/21/10 5:45 PM

#36602 RE: EarnestDD #36601

If the spec changes, there must be an accompanying change order to the contract, otherwise Todd is OBLIGATED to build the contracted unit. This is business law (or Universal Commercial Code) 101.

I'll bet Todd will NEVER disclose what was actually in the contract. That would show him in a pretty bad light IMO.
icon url

PenniesGoneWild

01/21/10 5:53 PM

#36609 RE: EarnestDD #36601

EDITED - With the amount of money paid, Todd was not able to put the machine together to show that he produced a functioning product.

Your personal feeling about Aziz is yours, I prefer not to use words as so regarding someone even though he had costed me money. Let me rephrase, he would have costed me money if I sold.

If you had a company, paid that much money, would you not think you should have been able to see the product tested and was working properly prior to delivery? Where to deliver is not the issue!

Or would you buy a lemon with no questions asked?

Without knowing the details to the contract, unless you do and would like to share with us what you know, we have no clue to the whole story.

Fact is Todd was paid good money and never produced anything but a pile of parts. His words!

Fact, the company files suit to collect monies..See PR

Fact, Todd Files BK and AMHD among others are on the docket. See the filings.

So, regardless of Cobalt or Cadillac to be delivered. There was nothing ever assembled to deliver.

What I did not know according to Flyboy's post, part came from another job and were already paid for by someone else. Is that not double dipping? Looks like Todd has a habbit of billing for parts and no delivering all that was paid for...hmmmm