News Focus
News Focus
icon url

puppydotcom

12/31/09 6:00 PM

#274074 RE: JackieChan #274069

I think pike will be trying to bail .. imo in fact he may have been selling all this time - since his last filing - that's why he averaged down early on

wonder if Pike and the RME3 were the ones supporting the .04 floor ..
icon url

Risicare

12/31/09 6:21 PM

#274104 RE: JackieChan #274069

Really that must be why the company was named in the Wells notice along with Metter and Moscowitz. The books are cooked and there are civil suits to fight along with the SEC, any money this company does have will be eaten up by lawyers and judgments.


On December 24, 2009, the Staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) sent a written Wells notice, which was received on December 28, 2009, to each of SpongeTech Delivery Systems, Inc. (“SpongeTech”), Michael L. Metter, SpongeTech’s Chief Executive Officer, and Steven Y. Moskowitz, SpongeTech’s Chief Financial and Chief Operating Officer. The Wells notices advised that the Commission Staff intends to recommend that the Commission bring civil injunctive actions against them alleging violations of the federal securities laws contained in Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (“Securities Act”) and Sections 10(b), 13(b)(5) of the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”) and Exchange Act Rules 10b-5, 13b2-1, and 13b2-2 thereunder; and Sections 13(a), 13(b)(2)(A), and 13(b)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act and Exchange Act Rules 12b-20, 13a-1, 13a-11, 13a-13, and 13a-14 thereunder. The recommended actions would seek, among other things, permanent injunctions and civil penalties.