"Several posters have implied that CYGX may have made a deal and then decided that they could make a better deal with someone else and changed their minds." How can this be proven in court unless facts are produced to this effect. May be PP's hope is this route, but I believe PP is missing one point here and that is NO OTHER HONORABLE ENTITY WOULD GO INTO A DEAL KNOWING THAT CYGX HAS ALREADY MADE SUCH A DEAL WITH ANOTHER CO. WOULD ANY ONE OF YOU IF YOU WERE A CEO OF A CO? I WON'T, cause it is ethically and legally indefensible, imo even though I do not have any law background.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
