News Focus
News Focus
icon url

HANUMAN

11/05/04 5:56 PM

#11954 RE: Woodrow F Call #11953

Woody, no one who's been here more than a minute thinks that PP and CYGX are one and the same. PP is an off-shore limited partnership. As for your previous post, your feeble attempt to put a negative spin on arnold's and cgyxup's post is laughable. The money spent in India by PP is likely minimal, and in China probably zero.

icon url

cygxup

11/05/04 6:39 PM

#11956 RE: Woodrow F Call #11953

Woodrow, you are right in your observation of my past opinion of CYGX. I did think that PP was a shell company because it was so secretive and there were no information about the company anywhere.

However, over the past year, many new information has shown me that I was wrong in my assumptions, so I flip-flopped as you put it.

New information such as the announcement by PP on the India clinical trials application and now the lawsuit changed my perception of the relationship between CYGX and PP.

I would say that my change of opinion is rational and reasonable. On the other hand, if given the new information and I still think the way I did, I would be an idiot.