News Focus
News Focus
icon url

jdaasoc

08/06/02 11:02 PM

#12435 RE: ajtj99 #12388

Crash Value lines up with the H&S target of 3800 on the Dow. It is a bit more optimistic on the SPX, having around 490

Come on calling DOW 7000 seemed like a stretch but MA's of charts starting from late 1980's did allow one to opine that call.

My only complaint is that todays S&P composition is not comparable to composition of S&P in 1982. Why don't you go back and chart a basket of stocks like IBM GE XRX et al or Wilshire 5000 or some measure that hasn't radically changed as much. Better yet chart G DD PG CL Goodyear or some companies that do the same thing as they did 20 years ago but much more profitably as I imagine that they do.

icon url

odiemutt

08/07/02 8:08 AM

#12518 RE: ajtj99 #12388

"Crash Value is calculated from the 1982 base lows with a 7.5% annual rate of return, which is fair considering the dividend cuts we've seen in the past decade."

Why use a starting point of 1982 which is the end of a
long flattish market? What number do you get if you use
1968 as the starting point? For the S&P was about the
same in 68 as in 82.

A more interesting calculation would be inflation adjusted
returns, let's say 2% over inflation rate each year instead
of a simple 7.5%.

Taking your S&P 490 number and compounding it for another
13 years @ 7.5% (to make the starting point 1968 vs 1982)
I get 1254...could be S&P is undervalued here.

mutt