I remember reading during the transference of power, from clinton to bush, that bush was informed that "Osama Bin Laden" was their BIGGEST priority and danger. And that, of course. 'he'/bush/they' ignored it and EVEN dismantled the "Bin Laden" department .. (wrong word, but something like that) ...
.........this article is most interesting. AGAIN, I'm not sure - who it was, (guessing here ) maybe Richard Clark ??
And yes, I believe, if this turns out to be true - this would be the exact reason for the public not finding out about it .
Why is this the first time we are hearing of this?
Why did Clinton not reveal that he was a target of this attack? Surely the incident, in combination with the embassy bombings and other attacks, could have helped create the basis for a vigorous response. In particular, why was this plot still a secret as late as 1998, when Clinton’s presidency was in jeopardy, and especially in August 1998, when the missile attacks he ordered on al Qaeda training bases were suspected of being a `Wag the Dog’-type ploy designed to deflect attention from his legal problems?
Again, imo, that would be the exact reason, or at a minumum, right up there with 'any' top two .......
thanks for that piece ...