News Focus
News Focus
icon url

cardinalstlouis

12/23/09 1:27 PM

#107 RE: greedy__malone #106

:


icon url

righty

12/23/09 2:46 PM

#109 RE: greedy__malone #106

and you are of course free to believe whatever you like!

don't necessarily make it so.
icon url

righty

12/23/09 2:53 PM

#110 RE: greedy__malone #106

So in essence you are trying to purport that all of this is to avoid paying for the divy, whilst opening up another shell to carry on business. lol

I think you might be partly correct lol

Now...let me ask you.

a-If you were dtcc, would you then go on to offer services to the new corp.

b-What would finra have to say about all of it eh?
icon url

righty

12/23/09 9:24 PM

#121 RE: greedy__malone #106

if all they needed to do was sell stock bud

it likely would have been far cheaper to just pay the divy and satisfy dtcc, and carry on until 2 -10 billion were outstanding ...r/s the stock and so on


that is...if in fact....that was the only sticking point!