!!omg ... lolol! I was going to post that SAME first sentence that you just did !! - you lack any comprehension skills I was going to put the word 'apparently ' in front of it ..
snopes is a biased source of "debunking". I realize you and many others feel warm and fuzzy with a "real source of info" that you really do not give too much objective reasoning when considering the "debunking".
Even by the snopes numbers- the gov spent far more than it saved.
One can argue about jobs etc... but those jobs and impact will be short term. They may even have created a spike but done so in a manner that will not be sustained.
Only a clown would defend blatant, out of control gov spending that will burden the middle/lower class.
Good for you for standing up for the elite and powerful that control our gov. (really pathetic but keep on....)