Au Contraire...These points are easily addressable:
1.Low Overhead Operation: They own nothing! They have no assets! They rely on outsourcing for eveything primarily because they don't have the capital to do it any other way.
The lack of distribution centers is the result of the reliance on Ingram. The lack of centers is part of the inadequate service level, bad service = disaster! Out sourcing can be a good thing, but also creates a lack of control, no choice for GZFX though, because they don't have the money, pure and simple!
I think you'd be surprised what assets they have. Between software and current inventory, it's more than a couple of million bucks. The lack of distribution centers and outsourcing is the key to scalability. Netflix has so many distribution centers that they have saddled themselves with tremendous infrastructure costs that GZFX will never be burdened with.
2.Lack of cash and no funding in sight spells trouble in a very capital intensive business. How much more advertising can they do with the current financials? With the stock at .025, the selling of shares will create much less cash for operations, with lack of buyer interest, it will be difficult to unload shares without the stock falling more.
Lack of cash? You're using the last SEC filing number of $27,000 in the quarter? Well, you might also be surprised by the jump in revenues this last quarter (to be filed in 2 weeks). There IS money coming in from subs, probably on the order of $80-100,000 a month (based on a conservative 4000-5000 subs), AS WELL AS a private placement program which is bringing in additional funding fromthose wishing to invest directly with the company.
3.The lack of overall service thus far has so far proven they don't have what it takes to survive! The people who have money in the stock are the only ones that appear to still have faith and hope.
You can't possibly hope to speak for the experiences of all subscribers, the majority of which may be very well be satisfied with their service. People tend to "go public" with negative experiences far more than with satisfactory ones, so your generalization of poor service is unfounded IMO
3.The lack of overall service thus far has so far proven they don't have what it takes to survive! The people who have money in the stock are the only ones that appear to still have faith and hope.
Believe what you like. Again, you can't possibly speak for the experiences of "most people". Keep inmind that the vast majority of users do not post on message boards.
You can have your opinion, and it's not a matter of me liking or disliking it. It is simply unfounded IMO, poorly thought out, and lacks vision. And that's my opinion.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
