BTW why did GILD drop their partnership with Achillion?
The GILD/ACHN partnership was not for ACH-1625, but was for ACH-1095, an NS4A antagonist (separate drug and separate HCV drug class), and ended due to GILD's concerns with pre-clinical cardiac tox signals. ACHN hopes to take ACH-1095 into Phase 1 on its own early next year; if that initial data is good, GILD has an option to opt back into the program.
why did GILD drop their partnership with Achillion?
As mcbio noted, the GILD-ACHN partnership for ACH-1095 (not to be confused with ACH-1625, the drug in the news today) was restructured, not dropped. A relevant piece of background info is that ACH-1095 is a second-generation version of ACH-806, which was discontinued in 2007 due to elevations of creatinine (#msg-18754183).