News Focus
News Focus
icon url

arizona1

12/15/09 1:16 PM

#87806 RE: Alex G #87804

I watched the video... there's nothing different from that video than any others I've watched

If you didn't see the squibs coming out below each part of the collapse, maybe you need glasses...magic or not.

what??? the entire Pentagon was supposed to collapse because one part of it was hit at ground level???

Well, that was an afterthought on my part and allowed you to change the subject without addressing that pesky little detail of building 7 which was what my question was originally about. So let's ignore the pentagon for now and have you explain why you continually ignore building seven and harp on the two towers collapsing because they were hit by a plane filled with jet fuel.

According to you building 7 was brought down from a fire and flying debris and not jet fuel...the same as the 1975 fire except for the debris part. Is that correct? Also, how was it possible the BBC and FOX news reported that building 7 collapsed about a half hour before it actually did?
icon url

arizona1

12/15/09 1:38 PM

#87809 RE: Alex G #87804

Also by changing the subject you didn't answer my question for a third time. In that video that woofer posted, if you didn't know what was taking place and the sound was turned down, would you or wouldn't you have thought that the building in the movie was simply collapsing or being blown up by explosives?

I wish you would answer that and while you're at it...what does this look like to you? A demolition or a collapse?

icon url

woofer

12/15/09 2:02 PM

#87813 RE: Alex G #87804

Alex, knock it off.........

you're comparing the 5-story Pentagon with a 110 story building???

wow, those are some special 3d glasses you guys have


I haven't done that. Others have.