yeah cook, that's the one. And as said, though ostensibly VERT themselves are not liable since "legally" no MM should be taking a position in this stock for their own book, in a legal case, records could be queried for the client. Of course, no one really knows if any MM isn't dipping in off book. Loads of possibilities hard to trace. But on face, it is what it is...and remains a client until proven otherwise through a formal investigation.
I also believe there was another wire where VERT was called out specifically...
And this is certainly true, and has been throughout the entire campaign. I have to update my list for the last part of Nov yet.
-- There are aggregate fails to deliver at a registered clearing agency
of 10,000 shares or more per security;
In general DF no doubt found out how much such an investigation would cost and had to bag it. Better to combat such manipulation with solid company performance. That's how the game is won, not crying about it or launching investigations. They're generally cost prohibitive. He knows that now.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
