hould be presidential when the situation demands it.
I want to see my president react decisively in a time of dire national need, not staring blankly like a deer in the headlights, waiting to be told what to do and what to say.
Again you are unable to pint out any substantive problems caused by Bush's actions. your objection is based totally on style. At least we understand ecah other now.
I take it you loved ronald reagan, he carried a presedential aura. I take it you disliked Clinton for not acting presedential by getting a blow job in the oval office.
you people have with Michael Moore; Michael Moore this and Michael Moore that--give it a rest. Michael Moore does not speak for me.
Moore,you and osama bin laden are the ones that have made this an issue. I think that between the two when you compare deciseveness, Bush comes out way ahead. Kerry has changed his position on the gay marriage amendment 3 times in the same DAY.
I jsut think that given the fact that it caused no harm, the issue has blwon way out of proportion. Do you ahve the same scorn for Kerry, who sat in hte senate building for 45 minutes, unable to speak or think?
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
