Replies to post #10510 on Simply Politics & News (GOV)

[rollingrock]

PegnNJ... No Iraq didn't directly have
anything to do with 9/11. I think he is afraid to say this is a religious war. It wouldn't be PC.

We went into Iraq to persue violent, Islamic fundamentalists that want to kill Americans. Do you want them to continue to do that? We have been "sending them a message" and it seems to be working.

[mick]

may i? hi peg , i have to say ""YES"" ! IRAQ ISN'T TOTALLY BUT RUSSIA , FRANCE INVOLVEMENT DOES INDICATE A LOT TO LEAN HEAVY TOWARD THAT SOMETHING for terrorist engagements is bigger than we will ever know. iraqi , russia , france , know a lot about [all three] each other. what about the oil for food program? this investigation isn't even started. these two mostly did arms trade and money trade for iraq's oil.
he has repeadly said , i attacked iraq because of wmd destruction. he followed through with something the u.n. wouldn't finish in #41 term. it took 13 years but we got saddam big time. one less terrorist to deal with.
9/11? iraq support to the terrorist is enough for me and that is why saddam is gone. don't forget he lost some family members too. why did saddam do all the evading stuff and hide and remove the wmd?
it isn't beliefs but facts and no fiction by the right people doing the speaking for gwb programs for the next four years.
again , congress ok'd the pre-emptive strike and then the action on 3/19/2003.

the missing wmd will show one day. today oct.29,2004 , a ranking major "soldier" said,we destroyed some of these claimed to be missing. there a total of 8,000 bunkers like this in iraq. to think iraq is a little bigger than the state of california.

[NovoMira]

Peg...I would suggest you also read the links in my previous post to Ergo... which contain any and/or all the information you could ever possibly want to know about 911 and Iraq.

And when you do, perhaps you'll also PUHLEEZE give us a break from your repetitive, inane, mewling posts that serve no purpose except to use up bandwidth!

Thank you!

[wstera2]

"I'll try one more time...yes or no: Do you think Iraq had anything to do with 911?"

What does that have to do with Iraq's obligations under UN
Resolution 687?


Text of UN Resolution 687 (AKA - The Gulf War Cease Fire Agreement)
http://www.dalebroux.com/assemblage/2002-11-15UNResolution687.asp

The Gulf War CEASE FIRE Agreement was a ZERO Tolerance
policy. That meant Saddam had to unconditionally;

1) Completely eliminate every aspect of his WMD PROGRAMS (not
just "stockpiles"). This included provisions for the complete
destruction of all offensive weapons. This had to be done in
a completely verifiable manner to UN Inspectors.

2) Saddam had to completely eliminate every tie to terrorists
(internal & external).

3) Saddam had to completely halt his crimes against humanity.

4) Saddam had to make full reparations to Kuwait, ET AL.

Now this was the short & sweet version. There were absolutely
no provisions that allowed any deviation from each explicit
requirement. It meant 100%, unconditional compliance. Every
single UN Resolution, including Resolution 1441 was
irrevocably tied to #687.

Saddam spent more than 12 years in utter defiance of every
one of the above requirements before Bush's so-called "rush
to war". You know, where "Bush lied & misled" America
into a "unilateral", "illegal" war to take over their oil for
his Big Oil cronies?