Why would it be misleading righty?
LFBG has been utilizing contracts with other companies, new games, new agreements etc. for years with dismal results.
Why would one believe that 4 years worth of results that show very little in the way of revenues and continuing losses will somehow reverse themselves in the near future?
Seriously, this company has an operating history. In that history has been multiple games, multiple agreements, multiple contracts etc.
How can this be viewed as being any different until the actual results come forth. 4 years of documented history on the results of their contracts, agreements, etc. as compared to no results on current agreements, contracts etc...
I would say the misleading side of the argument is the expectations that these results will differ materially from the previous results.
Certainly they could but history would dictate that caution and a grain of salt should be applied to this news.
One can always speculate on the future while trying to ignore the past.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
