News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Golfbum

11/16/09 3:07 PM

#85417 RE: fastpathguru #85416

Guys

This is getting really old. Can't we just drop this subject?

AMD/Intel have got an agreement. Just let it go until something new justifies a new round of squabbling.

sheesh!

gb
icon url

Elmer Phud

11/16/09 5:29 PM

#85419 RE: fastpathguru #85416

Are you contending that Intel never used rebates of the forms described in section 3.5?

Don't be silly. Intel say's they're legal you said they better "cut the sh*t". Until and unless it is shown they are illegal there is no sh*t to cut. In your hast and excitement you came to a premature accusation.
icon url

RGood

11/16/09 5:33 PM

#85420 RE: fastpathguru #85416

Ya know - AMD has given away chips. And did alot of dumping(that by the way is illegal) I call that shi%.

Don't give me that crap that INTC did any so called shi%.

This is your fantasy.
Keep shaking those green poms poms.
This is not a fail. Get over it.

AMD did not have the capacity to get the market share when it had the chance.
This issue has nothing to do with whether INTC broke any laws as a matter of fact they did not. This is also not a fail.


Get your fricken facts straight.

Ronster