News Focus
News Focus
icon url

richard the Realtor

11/13/09 12:53 PM

#41384 RE: AllyAustin #41381

To find buyers at a higher share price.
icon url

private_wealth

11/13/09 12:55 PM

#41386 RE: AllyAustin #41381

Just a question we both seem to have. Any of you activist shareholder types whould be asking this question of MD. Why now? What is the business purpose of the arrangement? Part of being a shareholder is to cahllenge your management to make good decisions for you and your families. They are holding all of the cards (especially if you cant vote your shares)
icon url

richard.w

11/13/09 1:06 PM

#41390 RE: AllyAustin #41381

I have sent an email to Charles asking for a quick, accurate response to this very question.
icon url

MamamaMuley

11/13/09 1:09 PM

#41393 RE: AllyAustin #41381

You are the best at getting questions answered. Keep it up and I hope all is well down yonder. Peace!
icon url

slamdunk

11/13/09 1:13 PM

#41395 RE: AllyAustin #41381

If I were to guess, I would say that WB did initiate the hiring of JO. After the connection was brought to light, CPRK went into damage control. It would make sense for CPRK to maintain its relationship with JO, if only to save face with a major shareholder, and possibly agreed to maintain him as a spokesman. I would hope CPRK sent WB a cease and desist order to prevent anything like this from happening again in the future. While each of the parties were put in a precarious position by WB's actions, I find this to be an amicable approach in appeasing everyone involved. Of course this is only speculation and my opinion.