News Focus
News Focus
icon url

solar fusion

11/02/09 9:33 PM

#4283 RE: laurap #4281

Those trivial tables mean absolutely nothing to me. As I said many times before, I have already made money from IGSM (buying it at .0045 and selling it at .0095), and I am planning to make more money from it very soon. Flashing out numbers about a penny stock company does nothing for me. I am watching about 25 of them every single market day. I can see very easily what they do and what they ... own! I saw EESO, SYNJ, QASP, etc, etc, tank like crazy. So what? Buy IGSM at price a and sell it at price b > a. What exactly is the problem here? Do you see any? I am not a day trader. I cannot buy and sell the same stock during the same day. I do not have a margin account. So, whatever comes to your mind to insult me, is false. I am just a simple person playing the penny stock market. I can afford to lose my entire investment. No problem whatsoever. At times I feel like supporting the company I invest in, and defend it against all kinds of artificially ominous statements up here. So, summarizing the above, the situation is very simple: Go IGSM!
icon url

solar fusion

11/02/09 10:08 PM

#4285 RE: laurap #4281

There are lots of unhappy shareholders on any stock on the planet Earth. This means absolutely nothing. On top of this we have no statistics as to who sold on Friday and Monday, and why, and whether they made any money or not. Thus, we cannot conclude anything by simply saying "lots of unhappy shareholders". The meaning of this statement if vague without concrete, verifiable and tangible statistics concerning the situation. For example, how do you know how many people owned the IGSM stock before the stock pick on Friday, and then sold it when they saw the stock skyrocket (in comparison to the PPSs they bought it at)? In addition, how do you know how many stocks were bought and sold by the stock promoter, who admitted that he had gotten paid for the promotion? And how do you know when exactly the so-called dump happened, and by what and how many people? We have no shred of information relating to these facts. Therefore it is quite immature and unprofessional to assign blame to individuals in a totally vague and, very possibly, erroneous way.