"Then ask yourself, in this case without any outside forces with money at stake in the downfall of the company, then what are the motives of those truth telling detractors? Who are THEY working for?"
Why are they there? What possible reason do they have for hanging around?"
I ASSUME THAT THE ABOVE QUOTES INIDATE THAT YOU AGREE WITH THE NOTION THAT THE CONSTANT NEGATIVE POSTINGS ON THIS BOARD IS THE MOST BULLISH INDICATOR FOR THE STOCK? Meaning there are outside forces with a vested interest in making sure the stock prices does not apreciate. If that is not what you are inferring than you're not making an intelligent argument to the contrary. I would suggest rereading your post.
I would agree that using negative sentiment as the main bullish component to any investment thesis is not built on a very solid foundation. BUT, considering where the stock is trading, you don't need many matches to light this fire. It seems to me that Gene would be very well served to start communicating with his shareholder base. Ironically enough, the level of expectation is so low at this point that even negative news(as it relates to timing of the uplist) could get the stock going. At least people would know that is he still in control of the company.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
