>>NVS didnt want to flush more good money down the toilet on IDIX imo - it's fairly simple.
wallstarb,
My observation FWIW: You frequently overstate your points. NVS not exercising an option on a drug offers a negative inference. That is all. Others have provided facts or explanations that reinforce or undercut the inference.
To convert the inference into "NVS didnt(sic) want to flush more good money down the toilet..." is more than a stretch - it is hyperbolic, without recognition of the exaggerated nature of the statement. You should expect, in an educated forum, that others will resist such statements.
ij
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
