News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Zardiw

10/30/09 8:25 PM

#10149 RE: buenokite #10131

My main argument is there are no competitors in the TAPE business, but you continue to say there is with absolutely NO evidence to that effect. I provide the evidence, but you guys just ignore it.

As to P2O. I said the general process scales. So the only question that remains is if you add the catalyst to a big machine (we already know it works in the prototype), it will all go tits up..is that it?

I think that any chemist will say different.......If you add a tablespoon of salt to a glass of water, it's no different than if you add a 90 pound sack to a big tank of water......at least I can see no difference......maybe that doesn't scale.....I've never tried it......I can vouch for the ocean being salty though.........z
icon url

Zardiw

10/31/09 1:11 PM

#10164 RE: buenokite #10131

EMail response from John Bordynuik:

This is my answer and can post publicly.

The catalyst has been tested in a large volume batch as was stated a month or so ago. I did not consider this material. The fuel has already been independently tested.

Who makes the P2O machine? The processor is highly optimized and is much simpler for us to build – the asbestos gloves customs delay created an incredible opportunity to revisit the design. As it is immaterial, more than 1/3 of the original design is now retired, thanks to the gloves.

Who supplies P2O processor? More than one vendor supplies components now.

What vendor? Why don’t I just hand over my wallet too…

Staff is in all weekend (including me) to assemble the processor.


Regards,


John Bordynuik
CEO
JBI Inc.



z