News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Shawn Carter

10/28/09 8:42 PM

#42308 RE: joelotto #42306

LMFAO!!!!!!!!!!

Too funny!!!!!

What do you percieve as non public information?

the 4 acquisitions??

the 6 acquisitions??

The company buyback??

ALL PUBLIC INFORMATION!!!!!!!!
icon url

FoodStamps4stocks

10/28/09 9:04 PM

#42324 RE: joelotto #42306

However, Rule 10b5-1 also created for insiders an affirmative defense if the insider can demonstrate that the trades conducted on behalf of the insider were conducted as part of a preexisting contract or written, binding plan for trading in the future.[3] For example, if a corporate insider plans on retiring after a period of time and, as part of his or her retirement planning, adopts a written, binding plan to sell a specific amount of the company's stock every month for the next two years, and during this period the insider comes into possession of material nonpublic information about the company, any subsequent trades based on the original plan might not constitute prohibited insider trading.
icon url

Crystalballz

10/28/09 9:27 PM

#42333 RE: joelotto #42306

Joe, I'm trying to find logic in your anger... but they are all moot-points... the way I see it if the Dean is risking his 5-figures out-of-pocket, that actually makes me even MORE comfortable to stay right where I'm at..
icon url

Manti

10/29/09 9:02 AM

#42398 RE: joelotto #42306

You're on the right track. Now you just need to look up the definitions of "buy", "sell", and "trade". You'll then find out that Dean hasn't traded on inside information, and you've gotten all worked up over something that doesn't exist.


At least you're keeping the post count up.