Replies to post #24662 on Exobox Technologies Corp (EXBX)

[fsmith1952]

Clearly the market is waiting for some news as to how this company will proceed. We are all thrilled that there now is an income source... And that there are (will be) 150 million fewer shares out there being traded.... BUT, and it is a HUGE "BUT".... we all need to know now... exactly HOW will EXBX v3.0 proceed? How/who will be selling our 2 present offerings... and how will we deal with further software development?
The market wants NAMES.... and histories of these people....to feel confident that this can happen.
We will need updates on the status of so called "channel partners".... What happened to those we already had? Are they still on board? Can we salvage previously pending contracts?
I know it was a whirlwind event.... putting together the O/G deal... but we really need that same level of effort to put this thing back together.

[mozy-rama]

"We already have two 5-BR bricks; now, we need a skyscraper. I say, pay whatever is needed to whoever is qualified to get the AV software DONE!!! I don't really care what his name is."

LOL.. I was merely explaining how Software is being coded & the importance of having a Lead Architect Designer on board. The analogy was to help folks here understand the process of coding a software, such as Exobox's Solution.

What is up with you bringing up the AV Solution again? No where was it indicated nor listed on the planned offerings in development. Until we see an announcement from Exobox of such development being planned, the AV Solution is dead!!! IMO.. you do not understand the importance of Data Leak Prevention nor the product very well to understand how big of a market it is compared to the AV.

As an investor you should very well care who the Lead Architect is, as it dictates how good or "uber" a product is. If you have a crap product, the product is worthless & nobody will buy.

Who is going to work for free if you have no capital rolling in?

P.S. What ever happened to pinning the donkey? =)