News Focus
News Focus
icon url

texasspeculator

10/22/09 10:22 AM

#29706 RE: lowman #29697

Since it seems you are calling for others to weigh in, IMO, there is a lot of difference in the terms "world-class" and "world-wide potential value". World-class implies technology that would be included in the top tier when compared to all others of a similar type in existence on the planet. World-wide potential value would imply some semblance of value (however small or large) that may or may not have been realized throughout the world. The bar is much higher for "world-class". I believe there is potential for world-wide value or I would already be gone. I hope the technology is world-class and life-changing, but the jury is still out.
icon url

byrnetreatment

10/22/09 12:13 PM

#29709 RE: lowman #29697

Okay! Let's take a poll! Great idea.

I'd submit we have one semi-interesting technology: LTC. Hopefully a larger med-tech company will go for it. Although (unfortunately) I doubt it (hence my 25% odds).

CCT is a farce. Again, the battle cry of global warming and the money swarming around it has nothing to do with what is good or bad, simply politics. For those that missed out on Poli-Sci 101: Politics is the process of determining who gets what when and where. Nothing in that definition rewards anyone for anything. Simple politics. In fact, the biggest beneficiaries of global warming is big oil. If you haven't figured that out, take a re-look at your homework.

That being said, CCT is meaningless. Respectfully and regretfully submitted.

Had I known CCT would have been one on the cornerstones of this company, I would have never invested in it.

At any rate, let's do a poll! Great idea. How do we arrange it?