Replies to post #84636 on Tornado Alley (PROG)

[omegahpla]

No, your form of debate is dishonest. I gave you information about spy's within the inspection group.

I gave you informaiton about WMD traces in the river.

I put it together for you.

You are stuck on a preconception and immune to information, so be it, but don't call me dishonest. I provided good information and insite. I was watching everything unfold and I was in the Military when it did.

You don't want to learn what I can show, don't, your problem.

You are obviously much more invested in your idea of what happened and how it fits what you want to be the case, than you are about any information you didn't previously understand.

[omegahpla]

I told you I didn't. I thought I'd found the stuff, and I put it up. I was tired and you guys were tag teaming me.

None of the changes facts though. Dishonesty comes with intent, I've never had that intent.

Now, apply the same skepticism to what you say yourself, and you'll figure something out. There is no shortage of links to articles written dishonestly. Just a link to an article, especially in the New York Times, isn't always worth much. I've seen a lot of Huffington Post around, and it's made me laugh.

Do you ever sleep?