InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Orenthal

10/16/09 6:37 PM

#39197 RE: Toxic Avenger #39196

Kez, I am not sure these new ideas are anywhere near fruition. I would be highly disappointed if attention was taken away from Olifant or BAB, those are the winners and demand full attention atm.

This question, not specifically Normans, about thier focus is firmly on BAB and Olifant. Part of the reason they were not expanding past Michigan, a more focused approach.
icon url

sneaky_peaky

10/17/09 3:35 AM

#39203 RE: Toxic Avenger #39196

I really have no care to even entertain this conversation.

So is your thinking that DA is going to have Bad Ass Beer, "Greg Norman" beer and Rheingold all competing? And all of this will be paid for with the new financings while still expanding Olifant, Trump and the other liquor lines?

How could one possibly think they would be competing? Three entirely different demographics for one. And if "competing" means even having a presence then I suppose Bud-InBev, Miller- Coors, etal should just close up shop and go back to the drawing board with what they came to market with...one beer for everybody.

And enough already with the money required to come to market with this that and the other beer. Badass Beer was a pocket change come to market product. The money was shelled out by Bobby Mason. We are not a brewery. We buy product. We sell product. Done.