News Focus
News Focus
icon url

nwsun

10/08/09 9:54 PM

#125116 RE: janice shell #125108

Good response... its one of the possible outcomes...
icon url

TEX

10/09/09 2:07 AM

#125188 RE: janice shell #125108

That's a very reasoned response, and I hope all who read this appreciate that. However, I don't want merely "interest." I played this as chart play then stumbled onto the iHub "geek play," if you will.

Without the DTCC's intervention, i would've made good bank, on an otherwise simple transaction. it was not in the GVRP/GLUV realm: seriously, the DTCC is too powerful and must be stopped.

xoxooxo
icon url

Egor

10/09/09 2:57 AM

#125190 RE: janice shell #125108

Ok, I flipped in & out till my shares where free!!! What would be the outcome and interest for this case??? I shore don't feel I should get nothing after 4 years for almost a half million shares no matter what they cost!!! As zero plus interest = zero!!! Besides why should a non shareholder have the right to choose the outcome of my trade / investment???


"I think the brokerages should refund your original investments, perhaps with interest."
icon url

Joda

10/09/09 9:53 AM

#125237 RE: janice shell #125108

So you support a position that would be the least expensive to the MMs and the brokers...

And the least amount of recompense for shareholders...

Somehow we are not surprised by that...

Thanks for the advice and opinion...