Replies to post #52423 on Biocentric Energy Holdings, Inc. (BEHL)

[petergriffin]

YES, IMO bonus shares are given out to those who hold into the R/M; stop YOUR posting of non factual information. Why do I think this? My suspicions were first aroused by the use of the words in the PR:-

Biocentric Global Solutions

3) Will file an S1 Registration document for approval to issue One Free Trading Bonus share of common stock to existing BEHL shareholders for every Ten shares of BEHL shares owned as of a record date, to be determined.

Call me a bluff old traditionalist but I was always taught to read and evaluate before commenting.

I think you'll find you and Dennis were at cross-purposes when you telephoned. Dennis is an extremely busy man and can't be expected to know everything and perform like a walking textbook. Dennis correctly relayed to you the guts of the changing share structure but IMO just forgot to mention the bonus bit. Equally, IMO you forgot to ask Dennis about the bonus bit. If you had asked him, you would have reported it in your previous posts.

I think you'll find if the new Biocentric Global fails to push the bonus through, they could land themselves in hot water. The free trading shares is an incentive for current stockholders to carry on holding and adding and for prospectives to buy in. All IMO.

[BigBake1]

This is hilarious really, and further proves the point of many about how BEHL has made a poor decision about choosing to leave the dead body lay and to continue to foul things up. The dead horse has been beaten to death and yet nothing has been done to remove it…. It is obvious that nearly half the shareholders still look at the PR for what it says since it is a public document and has not been rescinded or clarified. The sorry state is that it taints any new potential investors once they research and read that the company has chosen the medium of word of mouth to clarify their poorly worded PR. Not a proactive means of taking care of shareholders, it is a reactive stance that is hurting them in the long run. A proactive approach results in people trusting their money into the hands of a decision maker, a reactive company wastes time and resources performing crisis management. We read it here that they spent hours upon hours on the phone trying to clear this mess up, a waste of resources and precious time, not a good decision from a leadership standpoint.