if they promise to send money back asap then why need alternative financing to pay the money -- if they have the money in escrow then interplead it into the court to avoid appearence of fraud and let judge or fedeal magistrate decide --they do not have money -- but i bet they dilute, if they have enough volume to get money to pay it to the court or federal referee
this one is in spng favor - though you are right, something happen and that is an important part of this
I actually know a bit about contract law. Interestingly enough - the spending of the money counts as much as any signature as an acceptance of term. Specifically the law applies to the cashing of a check. Delivery for consideration is the only thing missing : breach of contract.