Not sure that was indicated in the large ruling pdf.
As I said on another board, if I could go through emails, picking and choosing as I wished, I could present a convincing case of you committing crimes against nature with sheep. Nowhere did you mention the crimes in any of your documents nor did any of the sheep mention it, but the cow referred to it and that's good enough for us. Some might call it hearsay but it just confirms what we knew all along. Why not ask the sheep you ask? Request denied. Actually, we did interview one of the sheep and she(he?) denied any involvement but we hid her testimony because it contradicted our conclusion. We even denied we ever interviewed her until the Ombudsman caught us.
Market Data 
Markets 
