News Focus
News Focus
icon url

JDUB

09/27/09 11:30 PM

#103549 RE: cashgrinder #103545

WOW!! Start of some real coverage here folks. Nice to see finally.
icon url

jacko768

09/27/09 11:40 PM

#103550 RE: cashgrinder #103545

Keep trying to delay things JP, you'll go down eventually lol.... I need to get back in this thing. Its definitely going up. Only a matter of time. BTW does Jackson post around here anymore. What happened to him?
icon url

porkman385

09/27/09 11:46 PM

#103551 RE: cashgrinder #103545

"J.P. Morgan over the weekend filed a motion for reconsideration"

AHAHAHA!!! Are they TRYING to piss the judge off?!?!?!
icon url

fsshon

09/27/09 11:46 PM

#103552 RE: cashgrinder #103545

Delay Dealy Delay THJMW has already ruled aginst the interlocutory appeal, so if S&C wants another brand name of frivolous, then they can bring it on! JPM's attorneys are bordering on sanctions. All eyes are now on this case, this is getting better each week.

The Discovery process is also granted for Death of a corporation, breach of contract, fraudulent conveyance [what assets should have gone with sale], false transfer [is fdic P&A legal], confidentiality agreement material leaked to press, etc... No one wants to really bring these things up, because they don't want to admit they were spooon-fed the info from JPMC and their subs.

That 10 billion dollar mark coming from the attorney is a tell-tale sign of exactly where WMI thinks they stand if Sleet refuses to hear the case and THJMW rules on assets. JPM is taking a chance on losing 10 plus billion if they delay too long! I will be right here waiting and watching as this stock goes up in value with each and every positive decision and news article that eventually will have to come out.

~Fish~
icon url

Ocstreet

09/27/09 11:51 PM

#103553 RE: cashgrinder #103545

Isn't this a pretty old article???
icon url

Texan77

09/27/09 11:54 PM

#103555 RE: cashgrinder #103545

June 30, 2009, 12:45 PM ET.J.P. Morgan & WaMu: Let’s Go Back to the Beginning, right article old so i gues the divest was the big move , squashed lololol
http://blogs.wsj.com/deals/2009/06/30/jp-morgan-wamu-lets-go-back-to-the-beginning/
An interlocutory appeal, in the law of civil procedure is an appeal of a ruling by a trial court that is made before the trial itself has concluded. Most jurisdictions generally prohibit such appeals, requiring parties to wait until the trial has concluded before they challenge any of the decisions made by the judge during that trial. However, many jurisdictions make an exception for decisions that are particularly prejudicial to the rights of one of the parties. For example, if a party is asserting some form of immunity from suit, or is claiming that the court completely lacks personal jurisdiction over them, then it is recognized that being forced to wait for the conclusion of the trial would violate their right not to be subjected to a trial at all.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interlocutory_appeal

so jpm wants out completely lol