again .. since anything can be *posted* and most here have seen lots of discrepancies <and i've only been *reading* for mere weeks :)> .. i'll await confirmation from *thee* david patch
as i've said .. i have a tough time reconciling this david patch and the ny post ~ i dunno just me i guess .. i'm also fairly certain that exact same *content* in said letter to the sec .. showed up on a smb ~ i want to say at the end of august .. so did he write it or did he *copy* it and claim it as his .. or do i have my dates off ~ hard to comment with too many *unknowns* and without direct confirmation
lot's of *oddities* to go around tho' ~
it's a *trail* that takes more than a nano second to unravel ;-)