News Focus
News Focus
icon url

ibreken

09/25/09 8:37 AM

#213456 RE: Kung Fu Panda #213455

Weren't you just a few minutes ago claiming she wasn't even real? You have no credibility.
icon url

General Grievous

09/25/09 8:38 AM

#213457 RE: Kung Fu Panda #213455

" Her entire article is based on conjecture and speculation"

it appears she made the calls and did the work to find out about these companies. why would she give details like she did if they were bogus? did you try to confirm her findings?

icon url

rmessmer

09/25/09 8:50 AM

#213480 RE: Kung Fu Panda #213455

It will take you about 30 seconds to Google her and see her background, education, etc. Writes for Dow Jones Newswire and Wall Street Journal. Seems like a pretty credible journalist to me. As I said, people will see what they want to see even in the face of contradictory info.
icon url

Digs

09/25/09 8:52 AM

#213485 RE: Kung Fu Panda #213455

"IF" this so-called news article in the New York Tabloid Post had any truth to it at all, even an ounce of truth,don't you think other news outlets would have jumped on this story as well???

Given today's economic climate, don't you think credible newspaper's would have picked up on this article when timothy skyes wrote the same thing on Monday? Why hasn't "Investors Business Daily, The Wall Street Journal, The NY Daily News, Bloomberg, just to name a few, why haven't they jumped on this?

Given what is at stake here to the Market Makers, those that have shorted this stock, and those that have issued 100's Of Millions of "Air Shares", I am not surpirsed to see the lenghts that they will go to protect their own azz!

simply amazing...