Replies to post #213300 on Spongetech Delivery Systems Inc (fka SPNGQ)

[shooterkc]

I'm using one of my 2 allowed posts for a reply as I've been following Z4 and Janice for the past hour...I get where you both are going, but I think you are both wasting your energy!

Unless the SEC will enforce the T+3 covering of these FTD's, the Reg Sho list appears to be only that, a list no better than the paper it's printed on. Correct me if I'm wrong!

Z I'd love to have a few more posts, I'll behave! Accepted that I have lost money and hopefully I get it back, try to have intelligent discussions!

[happyguy72]

why do i feel goaded?? lol...


to be on the sho would mean that a negative influence is being pressured on the stock price... so there is a point in time that it is 'bad' for the sharholder...

HOWEVER, if an event occurs that would create an undeniably positive influence on the stock, then potentially, that 'pent up' negative influence could be removed violently as the inefficiency is taken out very rapidly...

(and THAT, of course, would be very GOOD for shareholders... and very bad for the shorts...)