AMGN’s D-mab data reported today in the “mixed cancer” trial are additional color on the top-line results announced in August. From #msg-40166756:
The phase-3 denosumab trial in miscellaneous (non-breast, non-prostate) cancer showed statsig non-inferiority to Zometa; however, unlike the phase-3 trial in breast cancer (#msg-39343263), D-mab missed showing statsig superiority to Zometa by a whisker (p=0.06). The hazard ratio for the primary endpoint (time to first skeletal event) was 0.84 in the miscellaneous-cancer trial and 0.82 in the breast trial. (The phase-3 trial of D-mab vs Zometa in HRPC is in progress with data on the primary endpoint expected in 1Q10.)
…All told, the miscellaneous-cancer trial is a strong result for AMGN, although NVS dodged a bullet by the trial’s failure to show statsig superiority for D-mab.
Denosumab has the tentative brand name, Prolia; the PDUFA date for the lead indication in osteoporosis is 10/19/09. #msg-39386685 is a good read on the marketing task that confronts AMGN, assuming FDA approval.
[The trial in the limelight today is in the second row of the table.]
The phase-3 denosumab program is one of the largest ever conducted for any drug by any company. All told, there are 22 phase-3 trials spanning numerous indications (although some of them are open-label extension trials to assess long-term safety that are effectively phase-4’s). The following table includes the most consequential phase-3 trials; they fall into three main groups: metastatic cancer, non-metastatic cancer, and post- menopausal osteoporosis.